<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lock, Stock, and Two Film Geeks &#187; documentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/tag/documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com</link>
	<description>Film review by two cinephiles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>William S. Burroughs: A Man Within</title>
		<link>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B.S. Hadland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solo Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/?p=2352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William S. Burroughs: A Man Within is an ambitious documentary which tries its hardest to cover everything about a very complicated man.  In a way, the film succeeds; they do manage to run through the life of Burroughs.  The problem is, why would anyone want to run through the life and ideas of a man as fascinating as William S. Burroughs; cliff note coverage seldom does anything or anyone justice.  If the film had focused its gaze on a particular time in Burroughs’ life, we might have actually gotten to see the man within myth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2353" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 548px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/background.jpg" rel="lightbox[2352]"><img class="size-full wp-image-2353" title="background" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/background.jpg" alt="" width="538" height="307" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Ambitious, but unfocused.  2.5 out of 4 stars.</p></div>
<p>How does one even begin to describe the living conundrum that was William S. Burroughs?   Writer, artist, cat lover, homosexual, junkie, gun enthusiast, godfather of punk rock, yet he never really fit into those molds either.  <em>William S. Buroughs: A Man Within</em> attempts to answer these questions, and although it offers an insight into who Burroughs was, it focuses too much time on the legend and less on the man himself.</p>
<p><span id="more-2352"></span></p>
<p>When it comes to biographical documentaries, or even biopics, for that matter, films will often pay attention to the legacy of their subjects rather than the subjects themselves.  Although the legacy is important to capture within films like these, it should also remain implicit within the film.  The legend of the man or woman in question is something most people probably know already, especially those attending the film.  Thus, these films tend to tell us what we know (<em>what</em> he/she was), but not what we would like to discover (<em>who</em> was this icon?).           <a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/burroughs.jpg" rel="lightbox[2352]"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2355" title="burroughs" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/burroughs-241x300.jpg" alt="" width="241" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Documentarian Yony Leyser is, no doubt, a huge admirer of Burroughs, and for better and for worse, it shows.  <em>A Man Within</em> covers virtually every facet of Burroughs’ long and fascinating life, and explores just how much influence this man had over everything: poetry, prose, art, music, film, culture, society, life.  Yet by documenting his effect on all these things, the film barely scratches the surface of Burroughs, who is far more interesting than anything he ever influenced.</p>
<p>Which isn’t to say we learn nothing of Burroughs.  Those who have only read <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Naked Lunch</span> will be entertained by the insight into his personal life, and how they affected his work.  One of the most interesting things about Burroughs was his love-hate relationship with his own drug use; it isn’t news to discover that Burroughs was a heavy drug user, but we also learn that Burroughs had no illusions about the nature of what he was putting into his body: junk.</p>
<p>Burroughs’ homosexuality is of particular interest in the film and is closely interwoven into everything about Burroughs.  Raised in a Midwestern Middle class environment in the earlier part of the Twentieth Century, Burroughs’ somewhat begrudging acceptance of his sexuality highlights his sense of ambivalence towards everything else around him.  This chapter of the film also highlights Burroughs’ aloof attitude towards his surroundings; an odd quality for a man who appeared at the center (or maybe just off-center) of so many cultural movements during his lifetime.</p>
<p>There are a slew of individuals interviewed for the film; some of them offer an insight to Burroughs, others provide very little beyond merely appealing to his legend.  Film director John Waters, of all people, is by far the most engaging interviewee in the film, and goes into great detail in describing Burroughs and his impact on society.  Actor Peter Weller (who portrayed Burroughs alter-ego in the film <em>Naked Lunch</em>) and Burroughs’ ex-boyfriend Marcus Ewert each have a few anecdotes about their time with Burroughs, and in doing so, offer a rare glimpse of Burroughs as a human being.</p>
<p>There are several interviewees, on the other hand, that the film could have done without, and appear to have been thrown in for the sake of showing off how eclectic Burroughs’ interests and social circles were (was the interview with a snake-wrangling acquaintance of Burroughs really necessary to the film?).  There are also several punk rock musicians who are featured in the film, and provide two of the films’ greatest weaknesses.  Although Burroughs served as some kind of guiding force for the punk movement, the documentary forgets that Burroughs is its subject, not punk rock.  The second, and maybe the more infuriating of the two, is how most of the musicians’ interviewed are a little too self-involved, and spend more time telling stories about themselves with Burroughs in them, instead of the other way around.  Patti Smith is the chief offender in this respect, who at one point, credits herself as giving Burroughs peace of mind concerning a dark period of his life via one of her spoken word performances.</p>
<p>However, in trying to fit in everything about Burroughs’ life into one movie, they rush through some of its pivotal moments, including how he accidentally killed his second wife in a William Tell-gone-wrong scenario, and the writing of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Naked Lunch</span>.  There are also a few videos of Burroughs with fellow Beat poet Allen Ginsberg that are fascinating; we could have seen two old Beats wax spontaneous poetic.  Unfortunately, Leyser tends to let others speak for Burroughs instead.</p>
<p><em>William S. Burroughs: A Man Within </em>is an ambitious documentary which tries its hardest to cover everything about a very complicated man.  In a way, the film succeeds; they do manage to run through the life of Burroughs.  The problem is, why would anyone want to run through the life and ideas of a man as fascinating as William S. Burroughs; cliff note coverage seldom does anything or anyone justice.  If the film had focused its gaze on a particular time in Burroughs’ life or studied a common theme in his work, we might have actually gotten to see the man within the myth.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/WIlliamSBurroughs.jpg" rel="lightbox[2352]"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2354" title="WIlliamSBurroughs" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/WIlliamSBurroughs.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="395" /></a></p>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_2352_fde303d25f2029a8'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/2352?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_2352_fde303d25f2029a8' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=2352&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com%2Fwilliam-s-burroughs-a-man-within%2F' /></p>

<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-shr">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-delicious">
			<a href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;t=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlereader">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within&amp;srcUrl=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;srcTitle=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within&amp;snippet=William%20S.%20Burroughs%3A%20A%20Man%20Within%20is%20an%20ambitious%20documentary%20which%20tries%20its%20hardest%20to%20cover%20everything%20about%20a%20very%20complicated%20man.%20%20In%20a%20way%2C%20the%20film%20succeeds%3B%20they%20do%20manage%20to%20run%20through%20the%20life%20of%20Burroughs.%20%20The%20problem%20is%2C%20why%20would%20anyone%20want%20to%20run%20through%20the%20life%20and%20ideas%20of%20a%20man%20as%20fascinating%20as%20William%20S.%20Burroughs%3B%20cliff%20note%20coverage%20seldom%20does%20anything%20or%20anyone%20justice.%20%20If%20the%20film%20had%20focused%20its%20gaze%20on%20a%20particular%20time%20in%20Burroughs%E2%80%99%20life%2C%20we%20might%20have%20actually%20gotten%20to%20see%20the%20man%20within%20myth." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Add this to Google Reader">Add this to Google Reader</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within+-+http://b2l.me/a9uyec&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-friendfeed">
			<a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within&amp;link=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on FriendFeed">Share this on FriendFeed</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-myspace">
			<a href="http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/&amp;t=William+S.+Burroughs%3A+A+Man+Within" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post this to MySpace">Post this to MySpace</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/william-s-burroughs-a-man-within/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catfish</title>
		<link>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 03:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B.S. Hadland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solo Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/?p=2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as we can tell, we are at the apex of the Facebook &#038; Co. culture, and it’s about time someone starts questioning what the culture is and what it means.  A tad pretentious and philosophical, yes, but that is where Catfish succeeds so well.  Instead of preaching from a soapbox made of tarnished modems, Catfish follows an ordinary, everyday individual who lies, like so many of us, in the heart of that culture, and effortlessly juxtaposes the nature and meaning of social connections on both sides of a screen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2346" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/aa513e9678atfish.jpg.jpg" rel="lightbox[2340]"><img class="size-full wp-image-2346 " title="aa513e9678atfish.jpg" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/aa513e9678atfish.jpg.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="666" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">One of the most natural and engaging documentaries I&#39;ve seen.  3.5 out of 4</p></div>
<p>It is interesting that <em>Catfish </em>be released soon after <em>The Social Network</em>, as both films present some insightful portrayals of the Facebook generation.  While <em>Social Network</em> traced Facebook’s less-than humble beginnings, <em>Catfish</em> captures a real piece of the culture that followed soon after.</p>
<p><span id="more-2340"></span></p>
<p>Given the film’s subject matter, it’s appropriate that <em>Catfish</em> is a documentary; Facebook, Google and YouTube are so prevalent in today’s culture that, when making a film about the internet and society, real life can speak for itself without the aid of a script.</p>
<p>When New York photographer Nev Schulman receives a painting of one of his published photographs from Abby, a young artist from Michigan, Nev begins a Facebook friendship with her and her family.  Nev’s brother Ariel, along with their friend Henry, decide to film Nev’s interactions with this family to see just how close two groups of people can get without physically seeing them.</p>
<p>Things go better than expected as Nev firmly establishes himself as new member of the family; he even starts a long<a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/images-2.jpeg" rel="lightbox[2340]"><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2345" title="images-2" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/images-2-300x158.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="95" /></a>distance relationship with Meagan, Abby’s half-sister, that begins to get pretty serious.  However, it later becomes apparent that Megan, Abby and the rest of the family are not what they seem.</p>
<p><em>Catfish</em>’s marketing campaign revolves around its final act, suggesting that something particularly shocking or grisly will be revealed.  Given that <em>Catfish</em> is a documentary and was not in the news prior to its release, I think its safe to assume that most people won’t expect what they would probably like to see: axe wielding murderers, family-oriented cannibalism and gimp-butlers run amuck in the Michigan country.  Without giving too much away, the ending isn’t so much a shocking change in direction, but a fitting conclusion that expands the nature of the film in a way that is plausible, but still unbelievable.</p>
<p>What lies at the center of <em>Catfish</em> doesn’t depend on a twist ending or a Bluetooth-endowed serial killer, but a real study of social connections within social networks.  How close can people really get at such distances?  Granted, Facebook displays the details of an individual’s likes and dislikes, favorite this and that’s, political and religious views, and, of course, the almighty relationship status.  Although social networking sites promote the more superficial elements of one’s identity, most people seem to forget that it’s the way in which these things converge, the context of such identifying pleasantries that makes a person.  Without that, it’s quite impossible to truly get to know someone, assuming that what they’ve put down is even true in the first place.</p>
<p>The direction by Ariel Schulman and Henry Joost never looses focus on the influence of the Internet, and often incorporates it in the film as if it were another character or setting.  The camera often watches the computer and lets Facebook pages tell their own story, and we often feel as though we are at are own desks, checking our profiles, chatting with friends and Googling whatever comes to mind.  Few films have used the face of the Internet in such a manner, and it seems so appropriate that a film about the Internet relies on the Internet to tell some of it’s own story.</p>
<p>One of the real delights of <em>Catfish</em> is how the documentary was started on a whim; none of the men behind the camera, nor the one in front of it knew where this story was going to go.  The directors have no real agenda or no specific narrative; it’s all up to Nev and his digitally surrogate family.  Not only does the story unfold naturally, but the relationship between Ariel, Henry and Nev does not follow the traditional or professional etiquette between filmmaker and subject.  Rather, the film simply portrays three friends fascinated by a peculiar event, all of whom are curious to see where it will go; two of them just thought to get it on tape for the fun of it.  The chemistry between the three young men grants the film a natural realism that is particularly inviting, and keeps a film revolving around Facebook firmly rooted in the real world with real people.</p>
<p>As far as we can tell, we are at the apex of the Facebook &amp; Co. culture, and it’s about time someone starts questioning what the culture is and what it means.  A tad pretentious and philosophical, yes, but that is where <em>Catfish</em> succeeds so well.  Instead of preaching from a soapbox made of tarnished modems, <em>Catfish</em> follows an ordinary, everyday individual who lies, like so many of us, in the heart of that culture, and effortlessly juxtaposes the nature and meaning of social connections on both sides of a screen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/images-1.jpeg" rel="lightbox[2340]"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2344" title="images-1" src="http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/images-1.jpeg" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></a></p>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_2340_fde303d25f2029a8'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/2340?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_2340_fde303d25f2029a8' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=2340&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com%2Fcatfish%2F' /></p>

<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-shr">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-delicious">
			<a href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;title=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;title=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;t=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlereader">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;title=Catfish&amp;srcUrl=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;srcTitle=Catfish&amp;snippet=As%20far%20as%20we%20can%20tell%2C%20we%20are%20at%20the%20apex%20of%20the%20Facebook%20%26%20Co.%20culture%2C%20and%20it%E2%80%99s%20about%20time%20someone%20starts%20questioning%20what%20the%20culture%20is%20and%20what%20it%20means.%20%20A%20tad%20pretentious%20and%20philosophical%2C%20yes%2C%20but%20that%20is%20where%20Catfish%20succeeds%20so%20well.%20%20Instead%20of%20preaching%20from%20a%20soapbox%20made%20of%20tarnished%20modems%2C%20Catfish%20follows%20an%20ordinary%2C%20everyday%20individual%20who%20lies%2C%20like%20so%20many%20of%20us%2C%20in%20the%20heart%20of%20that%20culture%2C%20and%20effortlessly%20juxtaposes%20the%20nature%20and%20meaning%20of%20social%20connections%20on%20both%20sides%20of%20a%20screen." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Add this to Google Reader">Add this to Google Reader</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;title=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;title=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Catfish+-+http://b2l.me/a53cns&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-friendfeed">
			<a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=Catfish&amp;link=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on FriendFeed">Share this on FriendFeed</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-myspace">
			<a href="http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/&amp;t=Catfish" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post this to MySpace">Post this to MySpace</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/catfish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Worst Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Goux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Early Bird Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solo Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/?p=2020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those unaware, Troll 2 is a film that is considered by many to be the worst film ever made.  And yet, it’s gained a cult following because it’s so entertainingly bizarre that it’s an extremely enjoyable view all the way through.  We reviewed it back in the day in our Film Duel column, check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright" src="http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/best-worst-movie-theaterical-high-run-260x379.jpg" alt="" height="350" />For those unaware, <em>Troll 2</em> is a film that is considered by many to be the worst film ever made.  And yet, it’s gained a cult following because it’s so entertainingly bizarre that it’s an extremely enjoyable view all the way through.  We reviewed it back in the day in our Film Duel column, check it out if you haven’t already.  Moving on.  <em>Best Worst Movie</em> is a documentary made by Michael Stephenson, the child “star” of <em>Troll 2</em>.  He, alongside almost every American involved with the film, had been embarrassed all his life about his involvement in the film.  But when a cult following begins to build<em> </em>around the film, many of the characters involved begin to see things differently.  In many ways, <em>Best Worst Movie</em> is the story of a phoenix.  It’s the story of new life rising from the ashes of something that was dead.<span id="more-2020"></span></p>
<p>The truly surprising thing about this movie is its focus.  Of course, <em>Troll 2</em> is ever-present, but surprisingly the first few scenes make no mention of it.  Instead we’re pulled into the story by one of the most incredible characters in a film of any type in recent memory.  And he is a dentist.  Why is George Hardy so incredible?  In all honesty, it has very little to do with <em>Troll 2</em>.  Simply put, he is one of the nicest, happiest guys you’ve ever seen, and he really seems to have an understanding of how to live life properly.  He played the father in <em>Troll 2</em>, giving the film some of its most memorably strange moments.  The existence of the film is, to him, one of the only blemishes in his life.  He seems to be liked by almost everyone in his Kentucky town, even his ex-wife.  The miracle of the film is, once he and his fellow cast members see the cult following that begins to build around the film, even this one mistake becomes a source of celebration and joy.</p>
<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft" src="http://www.terrabangstudios.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/frightfest-2009-best-worst-movie-review-04-420-751.jpg" alt="" width="294" height="216" />As with George Hardy, what makes this film so compelling is its focus on the characters.  There’s Claudio Fragasso and his wife Rossella Drudi who seem to be the only ones that still don’t understand that the film is a failure in almost every respect.  There’s Margo Prey, the actress who played the mother, who acts as <em>Best Worst Movie</em>’s most tragic figure, trapped by her own life.  Each of the other actors has their own horror stories to tell about how the film affected their life negatively, and we see many of their struggles to overcome it.  Because the film focuses on people and not necessarily the film itself, we get a much more distinct narrative about the effect of this film, and why it is so incredible.</p>
<p>That’s not to say that the magic of <em>Troll 2</em> is not covered in depth.  There are certainly talking heads here, but they are mostly the people with a fervent passion for the film.  One of them quite correctly notes, “Never has a film failed so completely [in every aspect] of filmmaking, and still managed to be completely entertaining all the way through.”  Another notes that the gods had to look down on Utah those three weeks of filming, because this film could not have been created without an immense series of happy accidents.  <em>Best Worst Movie </em>serves as a fascinating document of how something could go so incredibly awry.  But what is most notable is the fact that every person involved was trying as earnestly and as hard as they possibly could to make a great film, and it just turned out to be this beautiful mess anyway.  It’s something that could not be faked, and Stephenson does a great job of pulling together the evidence of this and presenting it in a way that fits in with the narrative he’s created around the people involved in the film.</p>
<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright" src="http://press.discovery.com/ekits/silverdocs2009/media/photos/film-stills/best-worst-movie.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="240" />None of this does any justice to how truly funny the film is.  Yes, there’s entertaining clips from <em>Troll 2</em>, but the people themselves are so entertaining that the film would be hilarious without them.  The characters involved here are just so wild that there’s no way not to smile through the whole film.  Not only that, but it’s simply an incredibly inspiring story.   Captured on screen are some of the exact moments when each of these people is able to take this thing that was a source of darkness and embarrassment in their lives and realize that they’ve been able to give laughter and honest appreciation to hundreds, even thousands of people.  While <em>Best Worst Movie</em>, as with many documentaries, is not technically a masterpiece in the realm of cinematography, the fact that they were able to capture some of these genuine emotions on screen is so valuable to the viewer.</p>
<p>Going back to George Hardy, because he really is the star of this film, you really get to see this amazing arc of him learning about this other world he had no idea existed.  He morphs from sheepishly sharing the movie with a few of his patients to wanting to share it with the world because he’s been able to realize it’s greatness.  There’s a moment when he is being read a fan’s screenplay for a sequel to <em>Troll 2</em> where you can see the complete bafflement.  Later, when he trolls the floors of conventions trying to spread the joy, he does so with such sincerity and innocence that you can’t help but marvel.</p>
<p>Would this film be as enjoyable without having seen <em>Troll 2</em>?  I can’t speak from experience, but I think it would.  There’s a story here that should be seen by all, and it’s hard to put into words the experience of seeing this movie.  It’s a lot of fun, it’ll have you laughing throughout, and it’s honestly and truly inspiring.  Go see it if it’s playing near you, and catch it on video in October if it’s not.  It’s a small film and it needs all the help it can get.</p>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_2020_fde303d25f2029a8'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/2020?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_2020_fde303d25f2029a8' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=2020&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com%2Fbest-worst-movie%2F' /></p>

<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-shr">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-delicious">
			<a href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;title=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;title=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;t=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlereader">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;title=Best+Worst+Movie&amp;srcUrl=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;srcTitle=Best+Worst+Movie&amp;snippet=For%20those%20unaware%2C%20Troll%202%20is%20a%20film%20that%20is%20considered%20by%20many%20to%20be%20the%20worst%20film%20ever%20made.%C2%A0%20And%20yet%2C%20it%E2%80%99s%20gained%20a%20cult%20following%20because%20it%E2%80%99s%20so%20entertainingly%20bizarre%20that%20it%E2%80%99s%20an%20extremely%20enjoyable%20view%20all%20the%20way%20through.%C2%A0%20We%20reviewed%20it%20back%20in%20the%20day%20in%20our%20Film%20Duel%20column%2C%20ch" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Add this to Google Reader">Add this to Google Reader</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;title=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;title=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Best+Worst+Movie+-+http://b2l.me/vrpjt&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-friendfeed">
			<a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=Best+Worst+Movie&amp;link=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on FriendFeed">Share this on FriendFeed</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-myspace">
			<a href="http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/&amp;t=Best+Worst+Movie" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post this to MySpace">Post this to MySpace</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/best-worst-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Might Get Loud</title>
		<link>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Goux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Early Bird Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Duel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is simultaneously an Early Bird Review and a Film Duel. In partnership with the Edwards University Towne Center 6 in Irvine, one of the few Southern California theaters showing the film, Benn and James watched the first showing of It Might Get Loud, the new documentary about three legendary guitar players: Jack White, Jimmy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright" title="500 days" src="http://independancas.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/it-might-get-loud.jpg" alt="" height="300" />This is simultaneously an Early Bird Review and a Film Duel.  In partnership with the Edwards University Towne Center 6 in Irvine, one of the few Southern California theaters showing the film, Benn and James watched the first showing of <em>It Might Get Loud</em>, the new documentary about three legendary guitar players: Jack White, Jimmy Page, and The Edge.  What follows is in our traditional Film Duel format, in which we both review the film and then comment on each others&#8217; reviews.</p>
<p>It Might Get Loud<br />
Year: 2009<br />
Dir.: David Guggenheim<br />
Starring: Jack White, Jimmy Page, The Edge<br />
Genre: Documentary</p>
<p>Benn and James’ reviews and rebuttals follow after the jump.<span id="more-244"></span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody></tbody>
<colgroup>
<col width="50%"></col>
</colgroup>
<colgroup>
<col width="50%"></col>
</colgroup>
<tbody></tbody>
<colgroup>
<col width="50%"></col>
</colgroup>
<colgroup>
<col width="50%"></col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h3>James says:</h3>
<p><em>It Might Get Loud</em> is about music.  Of course it is.  But it’s about the very soul behind each note that a musician plays, it’s about the way they channel their emotion, the way they channel life, and their world through their fingers and into their guitars or pianos or drums or whatever semblance of natural materials have come together to form an instrument.  <em>It Might Get Loud</em> is a documentary that brings together three “legendary” guitarists from three different generations: Jack White (The White Stripes), The Edge (U2), and Jimmy Page.  Each of the guitarists takes us on a tour of their musical history, their thoughts on music, instrumentation, and life  Then it’s all interweaved with an epic meeting of the three musicians where they talk together.  With instruments of course.</p>
<p>If this documentary tries, as most do, to tell a story, it is that of how each of these musicians came to become the artisans they are today.  This gives us three different stories that become the threads in the tapestry of a fourth story, that of the evolution of rock and roll itself.  If one is to analyze these stories separately, Jack White’s segments shine far above the rest.  This is partially because he is the greatest character of the three.  Jack White admits even within the film that he has created a sort of persona for himself, one that will distract from the fact that he is a white man trying to get at the earthy emotionality of black men’s music, blues.  But this character is simple fascinating to watch.  And whether it’s exaggerated or not, you can see that it comes from a place of pure honesty.  You can see it in his face when he talks about music, and you can hear it in his stories when he tells them.  This is a man who is willing to sacrifice having a bed in his own bedroom so that he can fit that one more piece of musical equipment inside it.  His approach to music is also completely unique and it enhances the interest of his segments all the more.  I’ll admit I am a big fan of his music, and that certainly had no small effect on my enjoyment of these scenes, but there is something to be said for the way his approach is the greatest tool for story telling of the three musicians.  The way he battles with his instruments, the way he forces up emotion from the bottom of his soul, the way he finds the oldest, most story-filled pieces of equipment and pulls a confession from them is so exemplary of what a storyteller looks for.  Listening to Jack White play live in the film is often moving, heartbreaking, and inspiring all at once.  Additionally, Jack White’s segments are the most creative in terms of filmmaking.  Rather than do it in simple documentary manners, he actually has an actor playing an eight year old version of himself, who he teaches his techniques and offers wisdom.  There’s less visiting of historical locations for him as a musician, and more set-ups that involve a setting that captures some emotional aspect of his music such as aged houses and barren farmland.  Artistically, these segments are where the film reaches its creative peaks.</p>
<p>If you’re looking for the most complete story though, The Edge’s segments seem to be the most thorough.  He really takes us through the evolution of his sound and his career, step by step.  Going into the film, I had the least appreciation for The Edge’s work, and fully expected to be the least interested in the parts covering his music.  While my attachment to his music wasn’t drastically changed during the course of the film, the fact that his approach to music was so different than the other two guitarists’ did keep things fascinating.  The Edge is clearly the least skilled and an instrumentalist of the three, but has a way with refining sound that the other two do not.  It’s fascinating to watch him trying to bring the vision he has for a song out through the equipment, and how it’s a constant struggle to express his sound accurately.  As he visits many of the locations that meant a lot to him in the past, you can see more reverence in his eyes than any of the other three.  He seems to have a better understanding of how he got where he is, and how things could’ve turned out differently, and in turn, these things get transmitted to the audience more effectively than some of the other artist’s scenes.  Still, The Edge’s music has the least resonance of the three and his story does not seem to have the struggle and conflict that would make it completely worthwhile.</p>
<p>Jimmy Page’s music on the other hand, is simply entrancing.  Whenever his fingers touch the strings, you can feel a master at work.  This is a man who has complete and unparalleled control of his instrument.  Some of the highlights of the film just depict him playing the guitar, and the interest does not drop any for lack of dialogue or vocals accompanying it.  He simply is a living legend of music.  As far as the narrative goes though, Jimmy Page does not open up in quite the way that the other musicians do.  He certainly tells his story from beginning to end, but the filmmaker’s fail to get at his soul’s connection to sound the way they do with Jack White.  Jimmy Page remains somewhat of an enigma despite all of his screen time.  It becomes quite clear that even he doesn’t understand the source of his power, his “creative spark” as he calls it.  And there’s certainly something to that.  Perhaps depicting the mystery of artistic creation is this aspect of the documentary’s greatest achievement.</p>
<p>Despite all the heavy footwork that’s put into the speaking segments and recording the incredible, incredible performances of these musicians, there are some unexpected moments here that surprise you with their emotional depth.  Specifically, there are two moments, one featuring Jimmy Page and the other Jack White, depicting them just listening to music.  Watching Jimmy Page grinning from ear to ear as he listens to rock and roll on an old turntable is magical.  Similarly there’s a show-stopping scene of Jack White sharing his favorite song with the world.  The music is haunting, and seeing Jack entranced with it is equally inspiring.  Within a minute and a half the viewer attains a complete understanding of Jack’s love for blues music, and the way it can express the human condition.  And it shouldn’t be forgotten that this film contains many scenes with all three geniuses in one room, and that they play music together.  There simply isn’t a way to take your eyes from the screen when you see these minds playing together, following each other’s leads, and taking turns making love to their instruments.</p>
<p>As a documentary, this film is in no way revolutionary.  I actually don’t feel that it tells a particularly marvelous narrative.  Its editing balances the three stories notably well, and the musical mixing works excellently, but it’s not one of the best stories put to screen.  What it does do is capture music, the minds of the musicians, and the connection between their art and the human condition in a way that I haven’t seen put to screen.  And it can’t be forgotten how incredible the music is in this movie.  If it wasn’t for those other things, this would be worthwhile simply as a display of music and live performance.  One could close their eyes and find it to be a completely enjoyable and enlightening collection of songs.  If you’re someone without a passion for music, it’s possible that this film could fail to please you in the way it has me, but it’s also possible that it will completely change your mind about music as an art as well.  If you’re already passionate about music, as so many are, than there’s really no question about whether you should be seeing this film in the first place.  Go.</td>
<td valign="top">
<h3>Benn says:</h3>
<p>David Guggenheim’s documentary on guitarists Jimmy Page, The Edge and Jack White goes in a different direction than other rock documentaries.  Rather than trace the history and exploits of these three artists, Guggenheim puts them in a guitar-and-amp filled room to discuss the art and philosophy of what it means to be a guitarist.</p>
<p>Some may say that, while certainly recognizable, some of the stars of Guggenheim’s film are not the greatest guitarists out there.  Where is Eric Clapton, Chuck Berry or Pete Townshend?  Then again, <em>It Might Get Loud</em> isn’t a rundown of rock and roll’s greatest performers, but an in depth discussion of style and interpretation.  Why do these musicians play the way they do?  What makes them tick?  What are they trying to accomplish through their music?</p>
<p>Jack White of the White Stripes, the Raconteurs and Dead Weather steals nearly every scene he’s in, as is the most eccentric of the three musicians.  Picking up were blues guitarists like Muddy Waters and Robert Johnson left off, White discusses his volatile relationship with his guitar, likening his style of playing to a kind of bloody fistfight with his instrument.  Following this revelation, there is footage of White bleeding all over his guitar during a furious guitar solo with the Raconteurs, which goes to show that he is not being metaphorical or artsy about it; he’s dead serious.</p>
<p>The Edge (U2) is seemingly the oddest choice for the documentary, as he is not known for aggressive guitar solos, yet his approach to his instrument is vastly different from his co-stars.  Described as a “sonic architect”, the Edge uses a multitude of effects pedals to explore the vast, colorful palette of sounds previously thought impossible for a guitar to achieve.  Not only is his philosophy and style of guitar playing enchanting, the Edge’s friendly, soft-spoken charisma proves to be suprisingly entertaining as well.  The stories he tells about Ireland’s violent past, his experiences in college and his own quest for that perfect, sustaining sound, The Edge proves himself to the most thought provoking and inviting of the three men.</p>
<p>It is difficult to discern what Jimmy Page’s exact specialty is in contrast to the percussive White and techno-philosophical Edge, since he is not only the best guitarist of the group, but one of the greatest guitarists in the history of music; one would expect him to part the seas with a riff.  However, Page offers an interesting history of English music in post-World War Two London and tells of his own experiences with the changing tides of popular music, starting out playing in a skiffle group in his teens, to playing in a little of everything as a studio musician, from Kinks singles to bland, predictable muzak.  Bored with accompanying others, he joined the Yardbirds, then the iconic Led Zeppelin to explore and break the boundaries of folk, pop, blues, and just about every other genre or style of music.</p>
<p>Again, this documentary is not a history lesson on the rises and falls of these musicians, but functions as a roundtable discussion on what events in their life lead to their growth as musicians and, more importantly, as artists.  Whether it’s White’s blue collar background, Edge’s distaste for Seventies pop music or Page’s boredom of the music business, each has a story and philosophy that provides a deeper insight into what makes these guys tick personally and musically.</p>
<p>Though the central location for the documentary takes place in a studio with the three stars discussing their opinions and views on art, Guggenheim follows each individual to their own respective stomping grounds.  The Edge gives us a tour of his old university to show us U2’s first, tiny practice room, first stage (little more than a raised concrete platform behind a classroom), and his small, private studio overlooking a beautiful Irish seaside.  White sits in his cramped, wood paneled house full of equipment isolated in Tennessean farmland, illustrating his earthy, bare-bones approach to music.  Taking us to his home in London, Page stresses the importance of pushing boundaries and technique, yet reveals little of his own process, thus asserting himself as the trio’s signature enigma.</p>
<p>Presenting three different stories and opinions from three very different musicians could prove to be difficult, and even an experienced documentarian could run the risk of turning this into a bloated, unorganized mess.  However, Guggenheim carefully stacks each guitarist’s message so that they seamlessly fit in with one another.  Furthermore, despite each musician’s different, even conflicting philosophies, they each share a distaste and boredom of what music had become in their own respective timelines and sought out a different way of telling the same old stories in a different fashion.</p>
<p>Putting three rock megastars in one room can prove to be disastrous, which Jack White addresses in the beginning of the film when he predicts a fistfight breaking out between the trio.  Whether it’s because of Guggenheim’s direction, the personalities of the three stars, or a little of both, the environment of the discussion table is open and friendly, making it very easy for the audience to get lost in the discussions and jam sessions performed throughout the film.  It would have been nice, though, for there to be more interaction between Page, White and the Edge, as a majority of the film follows the three individually, then pops back to the studio for a brief moment of time.  Then again, the stars of the film are not, in fact, the musicians, but the music itself.<br />
I<em>t Might Get Loud</em> is a journey through the history of music, and offers us a glimpse of its evolution through the eyes of these three guitarists.  From Muddy Waters to Link Wray to the Jam, viewers are exposed to the many kinds of styles, routes and personas of blues and rock music.  It is difficult to imagine that such an influential, definitive art form also happens to be relatively young, and its exciting to see how rock music has evolved from its blues, folk and jazz predecessors, not to mention how the music, the instruments, the songs, and it’s musicians have changed from 1965 to 2009.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<h3>Benn&#8217;s rebuttal:</h3>
<p>I like how James addressed the sincerity and glee of the three musicians whilst discussing their own affinity and influences in music.  When dealing with a rock musician, let alone three, it would be easy a film like this to slip into a kind of self indulgent, pretentious tone, yet there is something real and touching with White, Edge and Page when they discuss their craft that comes through the film.</p>
<p>I will argue, however, that although White was quite the character, I found the Edge to be the most thorough and deep of the three.  I found his experiences to be quite entrancing, and I think he brought a very warm, inviting presence on screen.</td>
<td valign="top">
<h3>James&#8217; rebuttal:</h3>
<p>Benn brings up a good point in the fact that there isn’t as much interaction between the three as I would have preferred.  When it does show them discussing things between each other, it is primarily one telling a story and the other two enraptured by the tale.  I did expect more jamming between the three than actually occurs, and every now and then the jams are a little disappointing.  This is partially because none of the three can really let loose their style and so it becomes a practice in either Jack White and The Edge adhering to Jimmy Page’s mold or Jimmy Page and The Edge following Jack White’s lead.  Interestingly you never see the other two marching behind The Edge.  Nonetheless the final song is breathtaking.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_244_fde303d25f2029a8'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/244?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_244_fde303d25f2029a8' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=244&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com%2Fit-might-get-loud%2F' /></p>

<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-shr">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-delicious">
			<a href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;title=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;title=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;t=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlereader">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;title=It+Might+Get+Loud&amp;srcUrl=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;srcTitle=It+Might+Get+Loud&amp;snippet=This%20is%20simultaneously%20an%20Early%20Bird%20Review%20and%20a%20Film%20Duel.%20%20In%20partnership%20with%20the%20Edwards%20University%20Towne%20Center%206%20in%20Irvine%2C%20one%20of%20the%20few%20Southern%20California%20theaters%20showing%20the%20film%2C%20Benn%20and%20James%20watched%20the%20first%20showing%20of%20It%20Might%20Get%20Loud%2C%20the%20new%20documentary%20about%20three%20legendary%20gu" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Add this to Google Reader">Add this to Google Reader</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;title=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;title=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=It+Might+Get+Loud+-+http://b2l.me/ajbp&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-friendfeed">
			<a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=It+Might+Get+Loud&amp;link=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on FriendFeed">Share this on FriendFeed</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-myspace">
			<a href="http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/&amp;t=It+Might+Get+Loud" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post this to MySpace">Post this to MySpace</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lockstockandtwofilmgeeks.com/it-might-get-loud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

